The claim made by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. that a worm ate his brain is highly unlikely, according to a parasite expert interviewed by Business Insider.
A recent report in The New York Times disclosed Kennedy’s 2012 deposition during his divorce proceedings, where he mentioned experiencing memory loss and referenced doctors who allegedly discovered a dead worm in his brain.
Kennedy asserted that a dark spot on his brain scan was attributed to a worm that had entered and partially consumed his brain before dying.
Kennedy argued that his health issues affected his earning potential and revealed a simultaneous diagnosis of mercury poisoning.
His campaign emphasized his physical and mental fitness compared to his presidential competitors.
However, Dr. Janina Caira, a tapeworm specialist from the University of Connecticut, expressed doubts about Kennedy’s account.
She suggested the described parasite resembled the larvae of a pork tapeworm, which typically infects humans through contaminated food or water in areas with poor sanitation. Caira clarified that the larvae lack the capacity to consume brain tissue as described by Kennedy.
Other medical experts also questioned Kennedy’s version of events, noting that while neuroparasitic diseases do impact brain health, the specific details of Kennedy’s claim are scientifically implausible.
Dr. Peter Hotez, a pediatrician and global health advocate, highlighted the significance of neuroparasitic diseases in underserved populations and discussed ongoing efforts to develop vaccines for these conditions.