Australia is preparing to enforce a social media ban for children under 16, after the Senate passed the world’s strictest laws on the matter. The ban will take effect in at least a year, and tech companies that fail to comply could face fines of up to A$50 million ($32.5 million).
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese emphasized that the law is essential to protecting children from the harms of social media, a sentiment supported by many parents. However, critics question the practicality of the ban, its potential effects on privacy, and concerns about limiting social connections.
The new law sets the highest age limit for social media access globally, with no exceptions for existing users or those with parental consent. Albanese introduced the bill to ensure that young Australians can enjoy childhood free from social media harm while offering peace of mind for parents.
The bill passed the Senate with a 34-19 vote and will move to the House of Representatives, where it is expected to pass given the government’s majority.
While the law does not specify which platforms will be banned, the communications minister and eSafety Commissioner will make those decisions. Platforms like gaming, messaging apps, and sites that don’t require accounts, such as YouTube, will be exempt. The restrictions will be enforced using age-verification technology, though concerns about its effectiveness and privacy risks remain.
Some critics argue that the technology could be bypassed through VPNs, though children who circumvent the rules won’t face penalties.
Polls show widespread support for the reforms among Australian parents, many of whom feel torn between allowing their children to use addictive devices or risking isolation.
However, experts believe the ban may be too simplistic and could push children toward less regulated parts of the internet.
Tech companies like Google, Snap, Meta, and TikTok have criticized the law for its lack of clarity and effectiveness. Some youth advocates also feel sidelined in the discussion, calling for their perspectives to be included in the decision-making process.
The bill has attracted international attention, with other countries like Norway and the UK considering similar measures.
However, similar laws in France and the US have faced challenges, particularly in terms of enforcement and compatibility with international regulations.
