Diddy is attempting to bring in a doctor from Columbia University to testify in his defense, but prosecutors are pushing back. According to reports, Diddy’s argument is that he was under the influence at the time of the alleged sexual assaults, framing it as a “mental condition” that could impact the determination of guilt.
While specific details are redacted in the documents, according to reports, prosecutors insist the defense must provide substantial notice before introducing evidence about how drugs or alcohol may have affected Diddy’s memory or cognitive abilities.
Additionally, the documents mention that the Columbia doctor could testify that Diddy was potentially unable to control his behavior. However, prosecutors argue that this testimony would be unreliable, as the doctor has never treated Diddy directly and would instead be referencing general observations from other patients — which critics say is irrelevant, given the varied ways individuals respond to substances.
Judge Subramanian has yet to rule on whether the testimony will be permitted.
Meanwhile, time is running short: Diddy is scheduled to go on trial for alleged trafficking and racketeering charges beginning May 5, starting with jury selection.
Diddy and his attorney, Brian Steel, recently requested a two-month delay to better prepare, but Judge Subramanian denied the motion, warning he wouldn’t allow a “fishing expedition” for additional evidence.
